<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
		<?xml-stylesheet type='text/xsl' href='http://www.kmklaw.com/rss.xsl?1328918066'?>
		<rss version='2.0' 
			xmlns:atom='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'
			xmlns:dc='http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/'>
		<channel>
			<title>Electronic Discovery Road Map</title>     
			<link>http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/</link>
			<atom:link href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/rss' rel='self' type='application/rss+xml' />
			<description></description>
			
			<item>
				<title>Zubulake Revisited:  Six Years Later</title>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 12:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
				<link>http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/Zubulake-revisited-ediscovery-scheindlin</link>
				<guid>http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/74</guid>
				<dc:creator>Robert C. Lesan, III</dc:creator>
				<description>
				<![CDATA[
			<p>A recent case out of the Southern District of New York sheds additional light on the issue of defining negligence, gross negligence, and willfulness in the e-discovery context, and gives insight into what types of conduct fall in each of those categories.&nbsp; </p>
<p><a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/Zubulake-revisited-ediscovery-scheindlin'>Read more ...</a> </p>
					<div>Tags: <a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/topic,e-discovery'>E-Discovery</a>, <a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/topic,edd-processing'>EDD Processing</a>, <a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/topic,electronic-data-discovery'>Electronic Data Discovery</a>, <a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/topic,email-retention'>Email Retention</a>, <a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/topic,litigation'>Litigation</a>, Zubulake</div>
				</div>
				]]>
				</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Reasonableness in Electronic Discovery</title>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 12:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
				<link>http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/Reasonableness</link>
				<guid>http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/57</guid>
				<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<description>
				<![CDATA[
			<p>In a world of tightening budgets and greater scrutiny, how do litigants act reasonably while still fully prosecuting or defending a case?&nbsp; Is it possible to thoroughly address e-discovery issues without breaking the bank?</p>
<p><a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/Reasonableness'>Read more ...</a> </p>
					<div>Tags: <a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/topic,Cooperation-Proclamation'>Cooperation Proclamation</a>, <a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/topic,e-discovery'>E-Discovery</a>, <a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/topic,electronic-data-discovery'>Electronic Data Discovery</a>, <a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/topic,esi'>ESI</a>, <a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/topic,litigation'>Litigation</a>, <a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/topic,sanctions'>Sanctions</a>, <a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/topic,Sedona-Conference'>Sedona Conference</a>, Zubulake</div>
				</div>
				]]>
				</description>
			</item>
		</channel>
		</rss>
		
