<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
		<?xml-stylesheet type='text/xsl' href='http://www.kmklaw.com/rss.xsl?1329000724'?>
		<rss version='2.0' 
			xmlns:atom='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'
			xmlns:dc='http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/'>
		<channel>
			<title>Electronic Discovery Road Map</title>     
			<link>http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/</link>
			<atom:link href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/rss' rel='self' type='application/rss+xml' />
			<description></description>
			
			<item>
				<title>Got Your Head Up In the Clouds?  Additional Concerns Over Cloud Computing</title>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 12:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
				<link>http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/cloud-computing</link>
				<guid>http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/78</guid>
				<dc:creator>Stephanie M. Maw</dc:creator>
				<description>
				<![CDATA[
			<p>In her January 11, 2010 post about Cloud Computing, <a href="http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/concerns-over-cloud-computing">Chris Meer</a> exposed three important considerations when evaluating whether or not to manage critical e-discovery data in the Cloud:&nbsp; 1) the level and quality of your Cloud service provider’s Internet security model; 2) the ability to access your e-discovery data and documents on a 24/7 basis if needed; and 3) the subsequent finely crafted contractual and working relationship with your Cloud service provider that is absolutely required in order to facilitate that access.</p>
<p><a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/cloud-computing'>Read more ...</a> </p>
					<div>Tags: <a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/topic,bet-the-company-litigation'>Bet-the-Company Litigation</a>, <a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/topic,Cloud-Computing'>Cloud Computing</a>, <a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/topic,document-review'>Document Review</a>, <a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/topic,e-discovery'>E-Discovery</a>, <a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/topic,edd-processing'>EDD Processing</a>, <a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/topic,electronic-data-discovery'>Electronic Data Discovery</a>, Email Retention, <a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/topic,esi'>ESI</a>, <a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/topic,litigation'>Litigation</a>, <a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/topic,outsourcing'>Outsourcing</a>, <a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/topic,risk-assessment'>Risk Assessment</a></div>
				</div>
				]]>
				</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Zubulake Revisited:  Six Years Later</title>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 12:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
				<link>http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/Zubulake-revisited-ediscovery-scheindlin</link>
				<guid>http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/74</guid>
				<dc:creator>Robert C. Lesan, III</dc:creator>
				<description>
				<![CDATA[
			<p>A recent case out of the Southern District of New York sheds additional light on the issue of defining negligence, gross negligence, and willfulness in the e-discovery context, and gives insight into what types of conduct fall in each of those categories.&nbsp; </p>
<p><a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/Zubulake-revisited-ediscovery-scheindlin'>Read more ...</a> </p>
					<div>Tags: <a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/topic,e-discovery'>E-Discovery</a>, <a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/topic,edd-processing'>EDD Processing</a>, <a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/topic,electronic-data-discovery'>Electronic Data Discovery</a>, Email Retention, <a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/topic,litigation'>Litigation</a>, <a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/topic,zubulake'>Zubulake</a></div>
				</div>
				]]>
				</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Email Archiving Tips</title>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
				<link>http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/email-archiving</link>
				<guid>http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/61</guid>
				<dc:creator>Clarence  Williams III</dc:creator>
				<description>
				<![CDATA[
			<p>It is a reality in today’s society that any organization in any industry that has the potential of being involved in litigation in the U.S. Federal Court system must comply with the&nbsp;FRCP requirements.&nbsp; The amendments which went into effect on December 1, 2006 mandate that companies be prepared for electronic discovery.&nbsp; The organization must know where their data is, how to retrieve it, how to meet data requests, and they must determine what data will not be subject to search.</p>
<p><a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/email-archiving'>Read more ...</a> </p>
					<div>Tags: <a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/topic,e-discovery'>E-Discovery</a>, <a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/topic,electronic-data-discovery'>Electronic Data Discovery</a>, Email Retention, <a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/topic,esi'>ESI</a>, <a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/topic,Federal-Rule'>Federal Rule</a></div>
				</div>
				]]>
				</description>
			</item>
		</channel>
		</rss>
		
