<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
		<?xml-stylesheet type='text/xsl' href='http://www.kmklaw.com/rss.xsl?1328916751'?>
		<rss version='2.0' 
			xmlns:atom='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'
			xmlns:dc='http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/'>
		<channel>
			<title>Electronic Discovery Road Map</title>     
			<link>http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/</link>
			<atom:link href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/rss' rel='self' type='application/rss+xml' />
			<description></description>
			
			<item>
				<title>Reserve Your Rights: Always Ask for Native</title>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 12:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
				<link>http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/reserve-rights-native-format-documents</link>
				<guid>http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/89</guid>
				<dc:creator>Christine M. Meer</dc:creator>
				<description>
				<![CDATA[
			<p>As the document production trend continues to move almost exclusively towards electronic formats, make sure you always indicate in your Request for Production of Documents the specific request that certain information may be requested in native format. This preserves your right to request documents that are not produced in a reasonable usable format to be produced later in a usable manner. Often times the most desirable, usable format is native especially if you anticipate Excel spreadsheets or drafts of contracts that may have hidden formulas or other information such as track changes.</p>
<p><a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/reserve-rights-native-format-documents'>Read more ...</a> </p>
					<div>Tags: <a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/topic,document-review'>Document Review</a>, <a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/topic,e-discovery'>E-Discovery</a>, <a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/topic,electronic-data-discovery'>Electronic Data Discovery</a>, <a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/topic,litigation'>Litigation</a>, <a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/topic,native-format-of-documents'>Native Format of Documents</a>, Rule 34</div>
				</div>
				]]>
				</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>The Cooperation Proclamation:  Way of the Future or Ideal Never to Pass?</title>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 12:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
				<link>http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/Cooperation-Proclamation</link>
				<guid>http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/25</guid>
				<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<description>
				<![CDATA[
			<p>When the <a title="" target="_blank" href="http://www.thesedonaconference.org/"><font color="#800080">Sedona Conference</font></a> issued its <a title="" target="_blank" href="http://www.thesedonaconference.org/content/tsc_cooperation_proclamation/proclamation.pdf"><font color="#800080">Cooperation Proclamation</font></a> in 2008, the concept was simple: collaborate with the adverse party to make the electronic discovery process transparent, effective, and efficient.&nbsp; Work together to reduce costs.&nbsp; Cooperate to fulfill the true spirit and intent of the rules.&nbsp; But is this possible?&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/Cooperation-Proclamation'>Read more ...</a> </p>
					<div>Tags: <a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/topic,Cooperation-Proclamation'>Cooperation Proclamation</a>, <a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/topic,e-discovery'>E-Discovery</a>, <a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/topic,esi'>ESI</a>, <a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/topic,Federal-Rule'>Federal Rule</a>, <a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/topic,litigation'>Litigation</a>, <a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/topic,Rule1'>Rule 1</a>, <a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/topic,Rule26'>Rule 26</a>, Rule 34, <a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/topic,Sedona-Conference'>Sedona Conference</a></div>
				</div>
				]]>
				</description>
			</item>
		</channel>
		</rss>
		
