<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
		<?xml-stylesheet type='text/xsl' href='http://www.kmklaw.com/rss.xsl?1328919647'?>
		<rss version='2.0' 
			xmlns:atom='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'
			xmlns:dc='http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/'>
		<channel>
			<title>Electronic Discovery Road Map</title>     
			<link>http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/</link>
			<atom:link href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/rss' rel='self' type='application/rss+xml' />
			<description></description>
			
			<item>
				<title>Ex Parte Discovery Permitted in Website Trademark Infringement and Defamation Case</title>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 12:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
				<link>http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/Ex-Parte-Discovery-Permitted</link>
				<guid>http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/147</guid>
				<dc:creator>Robert C. Lesan, III</dc:creator>
				<description>
				<![CDATA[
			<p>The recent decision of a Utah District Court has opened the door to ex parte discovery in cases involving website content.&nbsp; In 1524948 Alberta Ltd. V. Joe Doe 1-50, No. 10-900 (D. Utah September 23, 2010), the plaintiff alleged that certain website content infringed on its trademark and was defamatory.&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/Ex-Parte-Discovery-Permitted'>Read more ...</a> </p>
					<div>Tags: <a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/topic,branding'>Branding</a>, <a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/topic,e-discovery'>E-Discovery</a>, Federal Rule, <a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/topic,intellectual-property'>Intellectual Property</a>, <a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/topic,litigation'>Litigation</a>, <a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/topic,Rule26'>Rule 26</a></div>
				</div>
				]]>
				</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Does Your Law Firm Follow ESI Best Practices</title>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 12:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
				<link>http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/ESI-best-practices</link>
				<guid>http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/96</guid>
				<dc:creator>Clarence  Williams III</dc:creator>
				<description>
				<![CDATA[
			<p>Over the years the overwhelming volume of electronically stored information (ESI) continues to grow.&nbsp; </p>
<p><a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/ESI-best-practices'>Read more ...</a> </p>
					<div>Tags: <a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/topic,e-discovery'>E-Discovery</a>, <a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/topic,edd-processing'>EDD Processing</a>, <a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/topic,electronic-data-discovery'>Electronic Data Discovery</a>, <a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/topic,esi'>ESI</a>, Federal Rule, <a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/topic,technology'>Technology</a></div>
				</div>
				]]>
				</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Email Archiving Tips</title>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
				<link>http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/email-archiving</link>
				<guid>http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/61</guid>
				<dc:creator>Clarence  Williams III</dc:creator>
				<description>
				<![CDATA[
			<p>It is a reality in today’s society that any organization in any industry that has the potential of being involved in litigation in the U.S. Federal Court system must comply with the&nbsp;FRCP requirements.&nbsp; The amendments which went into effect on December 1, 2006 mandate that companies be prepared for electronic discovery.&nbsp; The organization must know where their data is, how to retrieve it, how to meet data requests, and they must determine what data will not be subject to search.</p>
<p><a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/email-archiving'>Read more ...</a> </p>
					<div>Tags: <a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/topic,e-discovery'>E-Discovery</a>, <a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/topic,electronic-data-discovery'>Electronic Data Discovery</a>, <a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/topic,email-retention'>Email Retention</a>, <a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/topic,esi'>ESI</a>, Federal Rule</div>
				</div>
				]]>
				</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>The Cooperation Proclamation:  Way of the Future or Ideal Never to Pass?</title>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 12:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
				<link>http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/Cooperation-Proclamation</link>
				<guid>http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/25</guid>
				<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<description>
				<![CDATA[
			<p>When the <a title="" target="_blank" href="http://www.thesedonaconference.org/"><font color="#800080">Sedona Conference</font></a> issued its <a title="" target="_blank" href="http://www.thesedonaconference.org/content/tsc_cooperation_proclamation/proclamation.pdf"><font color="#800080">Cooperation Proclamation</font></a> in 2008, the concept was simple: collaborate with the adverse party to make the electronic discovery process transparent, effective, and efficient.&nbsp; Work together to reduce costs.&nbsp; Cooperate to fulfill the true spirit and intent of the rules.&nbsp; But is this possible?&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/Cooperation-Proclamation'>Read more ...</a> </p>
					<div>Tags: <a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/topic,Cooperation-Proclamation'>Cooperation Proclamation</a>, <a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/topic,e-discovery'>E-Discovery</a>, <a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/topic,esi'>ESI</a>, Federal Rule, <a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/topic,litigation'>Litigation</a>, <a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/topic,Rule1'>Rule 1</a>, <a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/topic,Rule26'>Rule 26</a>, <a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/topic,Rule34'>Rule 34</a>, <a href='http://e-discovery.kmklaw.com/topic,Sedona-Conference'>Sedona Conference</a></div>
				</div>
				]]>
				</description>
			</item>
		</channel>
		</rss>
		
