Topics
- Privacy
- Social Media
- E-Discovery Project Plan
- E-Discovery Case Law
- 2006 FRCP E-Discovery Amendments
- Digital copier hard drive security
- Native Format of Documents
- Cloud Computing
- Technology
- Zubulake
- Sanctions
- Email Retention
- Sedona Conference
- Rule 34
- Rule 26
- Rule 1
- Federal Rule
- Risk Assessment
- Electronic Data Discovery
- EDD Processing
- Bet-the-Company Litigation
- TREC Legal Track
- Litigation
- ESI
- E-Discovery
- Outsourcing
- Document Review
Contributors
Subscribe to RSS
Recent Posts
- Court Rules on Social Media Sites' Privacy Settings
- Always Have A Plan
- Your E-Discovery GPS: Are You on the Right Track?
- "Massive" E-Discovery Failures Result in $8.5 Million Sanction
- Oh the stories a copier can tell!
- Does Your Law Firm Follow ESI Best Practices
- What do you think?
- Reserve Your Rights: Always Ask for Native
- Recent Court Ruling Could Impact Who Pays the Cost of Producing Electronic Discovery
- Got Your Head Up In the Clouds? Additional Concerns Over Cloud Computing
Other KMK Blogs
Reasonableness in Electronic Discovery
In a world of tightening budgets and greater scrutiny, how do litigants act reasonably while still fully prosecuting or defending a case? Is it possible to thoroughly address e-discovery issues without breaking the bank?
TAGS: Cooperation Proclamation, E-Discovery, Electronic Data Discovery, ESI, Litigation, Sanctions, Sedona Conference, Zubulake
CONTACT:
Brenna L. K. Penrose
The Cooperation Proclamation: Way of the Future or Ideal Never to Pass?
When the Sedona Conference issued its Cooperation Proclamation in 2008, the concept was simple: collaborate with the adverse party to make the electronic discovery process transparent, effective, and efficient. Work together to reduce costs. Cooperate to fulfill the true spirit and intent of the rules. But is this possible?
TAGS: Cooperation Proclamation, E-Discovery, ESI, Federal Rule, Litigation, Rule 1, Rule 26, Rule 34, Sedona Conference
CONTACT:
Brenna L. K. Penrose